I saw in a comment on the Do you know what an E-REV is? blog that someone mentioned Nissan coming out with a car (the Leaf) to compete with the Volt. I received an email yesterday with more information on the vehicle.
It does, indeed, get up to 100 miles per charge, though--unlike the Volt--it is truly an EV. That means that at 100 miles you have to find a place to recharge the battery in order to keep going. If the Volt was a pure EV, given what we know of the expected battery output (see comments to the previous post), it would be able to go about 80 miles on a single charge. So the message on what we can expect lithium ion batteries to deliver seems to be fairly consistent across manufacturers.
Given that, why does the message of 40 vs 100 make GM appear so far behind (again)? Mostly because we, as Americans, have turned into headline readers. We read headlines and repeat those to our friends, family and colleagues, creating our own kind-of-correct version of the truth. In this case, the Volt can't wait for the batteries to be completely depleted before recharging (without interrupting the drive), which is why GM can only tout 40 miles as "all electric." In short, it's not exactly comparing apples to apples.
Advantages vs disadvantages? In the midwest, where there is more "sprawl," I believe that the Volt--and cars like it--will have the advantage. At least until there is a way to plug a car in while working or eating at a restaurant. That might well be the future we are headed for, but it won't happen in the next year, which is why it's hard to believe cars like the Volt and the Prius won't still have a bit of an edge.


